The Value of Free Speech
There is a current effort to censor free speech on Substack with accusations of promoting Nazism. Name-calling is a poor substitute for analysis of where the threats really lie. We’ve recently seen examples of lying and censorship altering freedom of choice in the distortion of the COVID debacle. Without trustworthy information provided by writers on Substack like Robert Malone, Pierre Kori, James Kunstler and Surak, how could citizens of North America avoid being played? Thanks to this platform, many of us passed the practical IQ test of whether or not to take those genetic therapy inoculations which were promoted as “vaccines”, but were actually a depopulation experiment foisted on humanity. Without the freedom to acquire the knowledge of the deleterious nature of Nazism or eugenics, how could we see the patterns before it was too late? Isn’t the instinct to survive the prime directive of all life and without that skill passed on by our progenitors, none of us would be here?
Government can be used as a tool of repression, as seen in many issues throughout history, and our only defense against their numerous lies rests on an informed citizenry. We need uncensored information upon which to make informed choices, just like our ancestors.


While I appreciate the compliment, Chuck, there are serious problems on Substack that need to be addressed. There is a specific article that was published about 2 weeks ago calling for the murder of all conservatives. I hope you understand that terroristic threats and incitement to violence do not constitute legally protected free speech. And there are Nazis on Substack. I can't agree to sacrifice the safety of the Jews so some skinhead has the pleasure of calling for my murder.
I think that Substack is not enforcing its own terms and conditions. And I have a personal stake in this that I hope to write about soon.